| INTRODUCTION Behavioral Objectives Insulin Pumps Aids for the Visually Impaired TABLES
|
![]()
Insulin Delivery Options in 2000
Rose Marie Caffrey, MS, RN, CDE and Theresa Flaherty, BS, RN
IntroductionDiabetes is recognized as one of the leading causes of death and disability in the United States. Long-term complications affect virtually every part of the body, resulting in blindness, heart disease, stroke, kidney failure, nerve damage, and amputations. Uncontrolled diabetes can complicate pregnancy, and birth defects are more common in babies born to women with diabetes.
|
| Counsel patients that injection discomfort can be minimized by using insulin that is not cold and by using a new syringe for each injection. | |
| Counsel patients to select the smallest syringe size appropriate for prescribed insulin dose (4 units in a 1-cc syringe compared to 4 units in a 3/10-cc syringe look considerably different). |

Today’s manufacturers of insulin syringes realize that no two people with diabetes are alike. Manufacturers offer not only choices in syringe size, but also choices in needle length and gauge. Insulin needles are available in different gauges or thicknesses; the higher the gauge, the thinner the needle. Insulin syringe needle gauges presently available are 28 G, 29 G, and 30 G. See Table 3 for more information.
Insulin syringe needles are available in standard 1/2 (12.7mm)- or 5/16 (8 mm)-inch lengths. Some patients prefer the shorter length needle because the shorter, finer needle is more comfortable. The smaller needle size may also make the transition to injections easier for some patients, especially children. Despite the short needle’s appeal, it may not be suitable for all people with diabetes. A recent study addressed the effect of needle length on diabetes control determined by fructosamine and blood glucose
levels.8 Fructosamine levels correlate with blood glucose and reflect an average blood glucose level during the previous 3 weeks. The study results demonstrated that:
| Glucose control was not altered in nonobese type 1 or type 2 patients when using the short needle. | |
| Glucose control deteriorated slightly in obese type 1 and type 2 patients using the short needle. | |
| Glucose control was compromised in a small subset of study subjects, most of whom were overweight, when using the short needle. |
| Recommend patients consult with a health care professional before changing to the shorter length needle. | |
| Recommend patients carefully monitor blood glucose levels after switching to a shorter length needle. |
Needle disposal has become a growing problem in the United States because of the large number of patients administering medication with syringes in the home. The Environmental Protection Agency’s current guidelines suggest syringes, lancets, and other sharp objects be placed in a hard plastic or metal container with a screw-on or other tight-fitting
lid.9 Patients should be encouraged to check local regulations regarding sharps disposal. In areas with no regulations, the syringe should be destroyed using a clipping device that contains the needle. Such devices retain the needle in an inaccessible compartment, protecting the patient from the detached needle. After the needle is destroyed, the syringes should be contained. Recapping a needle increases the risk of needle sticks and is not recommended. All sharps, whether the needle has been clipped or not, should be placed in a container such as a plastic bleach bottle or coffee can. When the container is full, the lid should be secured with duct tape and disposed with the household trash. The patient should not use a glass bottle, which may shatter, or a clear plastic soda bottle, which allows contents to be visible. Small home sharps disposal containers are also available. These containers hold approximately 75 to 100 syringes and can be disposed of in the trash when full (unless specifically prohibited by local regulations). Home sharps containers are leakproof and puncture-resistant and help protect trash collectors from accidental needle sticks.
In an attempt to make insulin injections virtually painless, insulin needle manufacturers have made them thinner, shorter, sharper, and better lubricated. As needles become more comfortable, they also become more delicate. Many health care professionals believe the only safety issue related to reuse is the risk of infection from injecting with a needle that is no longer sterile. Infection rarely happens if the patient practices good hygiene. Reuse does, however, result in less comfortable injections because of the reduction of needle lubricant and needle tip damage. Needle tips become progressively dull and bent with each injection. Figure 1 shows photographs of new and reused pen needles.10 Damage to insulin syringe needles is even more dramatic since a rubber stopper must first be penetrated in addition to the skin. Health concerns associated with needle reuse are the risk of needle breakage while in the skin and development of lipodystrophy caused by repeated injections into the same site with dull needles.11 The FDA advises against reuse or resterilization of disposable insulin injection needles.

For many patients, insulin syringes remain the preferred insulin delivery device. Insulin syringes are simple to use, accommodate all types of insulin, and are relatively inexpensive. However, there is a segment of the population for whom the insulin pen may be a better option. Insulin pens are compact, portable, and discreet. Doses are selected by turning a dial. This device appeals to those patients who value convenience, since the need to carry a syringe and insulin vial are eliminated. Others prefer the ease of dialing in a correct dose versus drawing up the dose with a syringe. Insulin pens may also be a good choice for patients with visual or dexterity problems.
There are two types of insulin pens: reusable and prefilled. The reusable pen (Table 4) requires the user to load an insulin cartridge (Table 5) into the pen and attach a pen needle. Pen needles are available in different lengths and gauges (Table 6). The patient simply dials the recommended dose and follows standard injection procedure. Prefilled disposable pens (Table 7) only require that a needle be attached before injecting.

When using either type of insulin pen, it is necessary to prime the pen before each use by dialing up 1 to 2 units according to manufacturer’s directions and checking to see if a drop of insulin appears on the needle tip. If insulin is not observed on the needle tip, the steps need to be repeated. Certain considerations concerning pen use need to be understood, since the mechanics of syringe versus pen injection differ.

When using a syringe, the plunger physically moves insulin out. However, with pen use, the plunger exerts pressure on the insulin forcing it out. Therefore, pen users must wait 5 seconds after injecting insulin before removing the needle from the
skin.12 Expiration dates for insulin cartridges also differ from those of insulin vials. 70/30 insulin in 1.5-mL cartridges expires 7 days from the time the first needle is attached for use; 1.5-mL neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) cartridges expire after 10 days of use. With a 3-mL pen, 70/30 insulin expires after 10 days and NPH after 14 days. Regular insulin and Humalog in both the 3-mL and 1.5- mL sizes expire in 28 days. Expiration dates are the same for Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk insulin
products.13
| Advise patients to resuspend cloudy insulin by gently rolling the insulin pen between the palms of the hands before
injecting | |
| Advise patients not to store insulin pens currently in use in the refrigerator. |


Insulin pens have become a popular method of insulin delivery because of their convenience. Some pen users carry a pen with the needle attached or simply reuse the needle. Patients who reuse their pen needles risk needle breakage in the skin, tissue damage, and uncomfortable injections. An even greater health risk exists as a result of leaving a pen needle attached after use. Pen needles are double-ended; one end punctures the insulin cartridge and the other end penetrates the skin. By leaving a needle attached to a pen, an open passage is created between the insulin cartridge and the environment. This can result in insulin leaking out of or air entering into the insulin cartridge. When an insulin pen is transported from warm to cool temperatures, the insulin contracts and air enters the cartridge. Air in the cartridge causes the insulin dose to be injected more slowly, resulting in an inaccurate dose. Often, after the patient removes the needle from the skin, the pen will continue to drip
insulin — indicating the entire dose has not been delivered. Up to two thirds of an intended dose may not be
delivered.12 Conversely, when the pen is taken from cool to warm temperatures, the insulin in the cartridge expands and leaks out through the open passage provided by the attached needle. The result is a change in the concentration of NPH or 70/30 insulin. Both situations can lead to changes in blood glucose control. For this reason, pen needles must be removed immediately after each injection and replaced with a sterile pen needle immediately before the next injection.
For a variety of reasons, some people with diabetes prefer needle-free injection systems for insulin delivery. Jet injection technology can deliver comfortable injections without the use of a needle. These devices rely on a high-pressure source, such as a carbon dioxide cartridge or a pressure spring, to force liquid through a very small opening at a very high rate of speed. A fine spray penetrates the skin and delivers medication to the underlying tissue. Designed for easy use, jet injectors can administer injections at all the same sites on the body as a traditional needle and syringe. Usual rotation of injection sites is still necessary. Jet injectors offer the ability to deliver single or mixed insulin doses up to a maximum of 50 units. Insulin is loaded by attaching the insulin vial to the injector via an adapter. Doses can be adjusted in 0.5- to 1.0- unit increments of µ-100 insulin. Some models have an audible click for each unit loaded, thus making it appropriate for use by the visually impaired. A range of comfort settings allows for adjustment of penetration pressure depending on insulin type and volume, injection site, and skin type. Despite the ability to adjust penetration pressure, some users find the injections painful. The size of the device is also considered a disadvantage by some. Needle disposal is not a concern for jet injector users.
|
Increased risk of hypoglycemia can occur if insulin absorption has been enhanced. Recommend that patients monitor blood glucose levels a minimum of 3 days prior to switching to a jet injector and on a regular basis thereafter. | |
|
Remind jet injector users that normal rotation of injection sites remains necessary. |
External insulin pumps provide yet another insulin delivery option for people with diabetes. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion debuted in the early 1960s with a device so large that widespread acceptance and use were prohibited. Insulin pumps today consist of an insulin reservoir, a small battery-operated pump, and a computer chip that controls the amount of insulin the pump delivers. All three components are housed in a case roughly the size of a beeper. Insulin pumps connect to a narrow, flexible plastic tubing that ends with a needle or soft cannula inserted just under the skin near the abdomen. These infusion sets are generally changed every 2 to 3 days. Lipohypertrophy and site infection can occur if infusion sets are left in place too long. Poor or unpredictable insulin absorption may result. The pump can be worn on a belt or in a pocket. Frequent blood glucose monitoring is essential to determine insulin dosages and to ensure that insulin is being delivered.
Insulin replacement is provided in a physiologic fashion, integrating both basal insulin secretion and prandial incremental insulin secretion. Users set the pump to deliver a steady flow or “basal” amount of regular insulin in small amounts. Most pumps today have the option for setting several basal rates. Pumps dispense “bolus” doses of regular insulin (several units at a time) at meals and at times when the patient has determined that blood glucose levels are too high. The combination of basal and bolus insulin infusion more closely mimics normal pancreatic insulin secretion. The ability to control both of these rates independently gives the pump user greater flexibility in responding to anticipated and unanticipated changes in insulin needs. In addition to the more physiologic mode of insulin delivery, the insulin itself is absorbed with greater predictability. Variable insulin absorption is responsible for up to 80% of the day-to-day fluctuation in blood glucose concentrations in persons using injection-based
therapy,14 whereas the regular insulin delivered by an insulin pump shows far more predictable absorption—varying by less than 2.8% from the administered 24-hour
dose.15 The effectiveness of pump therapy in helping people with diabetes achieve near-normal glycemia, as well as providing greater lifestyle flexibility, has added to this device’s growing popularity
(Table 8).

|
Advise pump users to change infusion set if blood glucose levels are elevated on two consecutive measurements. | |
|
Counsel pump users to always have insulin syringes and insulin available in the event that pump therapy must be temporarily discontinued. |
Implantable insulin pumps are currently under investigation and limited to experimental use only in the United States. In this approach, pumps programmed to deliver a continuous basal rate of insulin are surgically implanted into the left side of the abdomen. The pump is disk-shaped and weighs 6 to 8 oz. Users deliver bolus insulin doses with a remote control unit that prompts the pump to give the specified amount of insulin. Studies have shown that insulin delivered intraperitoneally is absorbed rapidly and predictably. The result is hepatic delivery of insulin, which more closely resembles normal physiology.
Recent progress has been made in the development of inhaled insulin as an alternative to insulin injections for people with diabetes. Two multicenter clinical trials have reported findings that reveal inhaled insulin is as effective as injected insulin in achieving overall blood glucose control.17,18 A device similar to an asthma inhaler was used in the trials to convert powdered insulin into an aerosol that then passed directly into the participant’s lungs and bloodstream. No significant side effects or changes in pulmonary function were reported. Patients administered one to two inhalations before meals. Because the experimental system used only short-acting insulin, an injection of long-acting insulin was necessary at bedtime to control blood glucose levels during the night. Additional clinical trials are currently in progress.
Visual impairment may be a problem for people with diabetes. Short-term fluctuations in blood glucose, as well as the long-term effects of diabetes, can contribute to significant vision disturbance and loss. Drawing up a correct dose of insulin may become a daily exercise in frustration for many. Products designed to aid with accurate dose measurement are available and generally fall into three categories: nonvisual insulin measurement, needle guides and vial stabilizers, and syringe magnifiers. Some products handle more than one task (ie, magnify syringe barrel and stabilize insulin vial)
(Table 9).

Diabetes continues to be an expensive and complicated disease that requires constant vigilance and intervention on the part of the patient to achieve good glycemic control. Although insulin has remained an integral part of therapeutic strategies over the years, choices for insulin delivery have changed dramatically in recent times. Patients with diabetes are no longer limited to one type of insulin administration, but can choose from a variety of delivery devices that best suit their personalities and lifestyle. In addition, individuals who suffer from visual impairment can be aided by a whole host of products designed to help them manage their disease independently.
1. U S Department of Health and Human Services. (1998). Diabetes Statistics, NIH Publication # 96-3873.
2. Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus , ADA. Diabetes Care 1999; 22 (Suppl 1):S5-S19.
3. Ryan, Edmond A., et al. (1995) Defects in Insulin Secretion and Action in Women With a History of Gestational Diabetes. Diabetes, Volume 44: 506-512.
4. The Diabetes Control Complications Trial Research Group. (1993). The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Eng J of Medicine, 329: 977-986.
5. Implications of the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study, (1998), Position Statement Diabetes Care 21:2180-84.
6. UKPDS Group (1997) Plasma lipids and lipoproteins at diagnosis of NIDDM by age and sex. Diabetes Care; 20:1683-1687.
7. American Diabetes Association Resource Guide 2000, suppl. To Diabetes Forecast.
8. Ginsberg, B. (1996). Glucose control and shorter length pen needles. New Jersey, Becton Dickinson NJ.
9. Patton, W. (1990) Your Syringe is Medical Waste, Diabetes Forecast, Oct. 27-29
10. BD, Unpublished manuscript (2000). A Look at the Reuse of Insulin Needles,
Franklin Lakes, NJ
11. BD Consumer Healthcare Works to Promote Proper Use of Needles, Chain Drug Review, March 27, 2000.
12. Ginsberg, B., Parkes, J., Sparacino, C., (1994) The Kinetics of insulin administration by insulin pens. Horm Met Res, 26: 584-587.
13. Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN and Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals Inc.
14. Binder, C., et al. (1984). Insulin pharmacokinetics . Diabetes Care. (7), 188-199.
15. Lauritizen, T., et al. (1983). Pharmacokinetics of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. Diabetologia ( 24), 326-329.
16. The Diabetes Mall
(http://wwwdiabetesnet.com).
17. Skyler, J, MD, Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus With Inhaled Human
Insulin: A 3-Month, Multicenter Trial, ADA 1998 Scientific Sessions.
18. Cefalu, W.T., Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With Inhaled Insulin:
A 3-Month, Multidenter Trial, ADA 1998 Scientific Sessions.
Temple University School of Pharmacy is approved by the American Council on Pharmaceutical Education (ACPE) as a provider of continuing pharmaceutical education. Its CE programs are developed in accordance with the “Criteria for Quality and Interpretive Guidelines” of ACPE. This program is acceptable for 2.0 hours of Continuing Education Credits (0.2 CEU) through October 31, 2003. ACPE Pgm I.D. 057-999-00-068-H04.